buy cheap software coupon
Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5.5 Web Premium Student and Teacher for Mac OEM
Buy Acrobat X Pro for Mac
Buy Adobe Creative Suite 5 Master Collection for Mac OEM
Buy Rosetta Stone Arabic
Cheap Autodesk Alias Surface 2012
viagra canada
how to buy cialis in canada
cialis generic online
Buy Cialis Online
order viagra online
Buy Femara Without Prescription
Nuclear Industry Association Logo
Friday 10 February 2012
Home
About Us
Contact Us
News
Key Issues
Industry Information
Useful Links
Events
Industry Link
UK Nuclear Future Brochure
NIA Industry Maps
essentialguide.png
edf_button_copy.png
get_involved
energy_excellence
nucleargraduates

 

Home
The cost of keeping the lights on | Print |  E-mail
Monday, 24 July 2006
In a report published in March, The Royal Academy of Engineering revealed that electricity from offshore wind farms, currently the most viable renewable source, will cost at least twice as much as that from conventional sources.

In a report published in March, The Royal Academy of Engineering revealed that electricity from offshore wind farms, currently the most viable renewable source, will cost at least twice as much as that from conventional sources. The independent study, commissioned from international energy consultants PB Power, puts all energy sources on a level playing field by comparing the costs of generating electricity from new plants using a range of different technologies and energy sources. Our cheapest electricity will come from gas turbines and nuclear stations, costing just 2.3p/kWh, compared with 3.7p/kWh for onshore wind and 5.5p/kWh for offshore wind farms.

In the case of wind energy it is also necessary to provide back up capacity for when the wind does not blow. In this report, a rather generous assumption of needing about 65% back-up power from conventional sources was made. The Academy had previously called for even higher back-up, more like 75 to 80%. Even so the cost of back up capacity adds 1.7p/kWh to the costs. Onshore wind generation is the cheapest renewable, but with back up, the report finds that it costs two and a half times as much as gas or nuclear.

Wind, nuclear and biomass generation all have the benefit of not emitting carbon dioxide, and the Academy/PB Power study also looked at the impact on costs of capturing carbon dioxide for all fossil fuels. This could add at least 2p/kWh for coal-fired generators and 1-2p/kWh for gas generators.

This study did not consider transmission costs to individual technologies or storage costs for gas to ensure security of supply - the market currently absorbs these through system operating costs or the cost of gas. However, providing energy a long way from the eventual customer will add to its cost. The report also notes that the renewables sector already benefits from subsidies worth around £485 million a year through the Renewables Obligation.

 
< Prev   Next >
Nuclear - part of the solution