Buy Adobe Captivate CS5.5
Buy CS5 Design Premium
Cheap Autodesk Alias Automotive 2012
Buy Adobe InCopy CS5 OEM
buy antivirus software
Cheap Toon Boom Storyboard Pro
real viagra online
buy viagra cheap
Buy Chloroquine Online
Buy Lexapro Without Prescription
Buy Zyban Without Prescription
Buy Adalat Online
Nuclear Industry Association Logo
Friday 10 February 2012
Home
About Us
Contact Us
News
Key Issues
Industry Information
Useful Links
Events
Industry Link
UK Nuclear Future Brochure
NIA Industry Maps
essentialguide.png
edf_button_copy.png
get_involved
energy_excellence
nucleargraduates

 

Home
Nuclear energy: a cornerstone for security of supply? | Print |  E-mail
Monday, 24 July 2006
The All Party Group on Nuclear Energy held a joint debate on Tuesday 9 March with the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies, proposed by Bill Tynan MP and chaired by Paddy Tipping MP. Malcolm Grimston, Senior Research Fellow at Imperial College, supported the motion and Dr Tony White of Climate Change Capital represented the sceptical position.

The All Party Group on Nuclear Energy held a joint debate on Tuesday 9 March with the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies, proposed by Bill Tynan MP and chaired by Paddy Tipping MP. Malcolm Grimston, Senior Research Fellow at Imperial College, supported the motion and Dr Tony White of Climate Change Capital represented the sceptical position.

Malcolm Grimston proposed that nuclear energy is essential and not optional. He highlighted the sustainability and environmental benefits of nuclear. He raised concerns over gas dependence from Russia by 2010. He acknowledged that renewables are essential in the future mix, but are dominated by wind power, which is intermittent. Also, in the current global electricity market power failure may cost 200% of normal production costs or more. Keeping the lights on is the cheaper option.

Tony White, felt investors need reliability, stability and guarantees of return on investment. With high capital investment required in the design and build phases of nuclear stations, the City needs to look at returns over 30 years with current designs. He questioned whether even modular nuclear reactor designs such as Pebble Bed would attract investment, and dismissed the chances of funding larger designs such as AP-1000 or 600 within the current free market.

However, Dr White questioned whether free markets could provide security of supply over any energy mix. He identified nuclear as the only source where full lifecycle costs were being addressed. He used an amusing science fiction based quote: "The future can be nuclear Jim - but not as we know it".

Asked to look into their crystal balls to 2024 onwards, Mr Grimston predicted significant new build, with 40% of electricity across Europe supplied by nuclear and Dr White expected nuclear to provide 30% of electricity needs, with smaller nuclear units the successful players in the nuclear market.

 
< Prev   Next >
Nuclear - part of the solution