Cheap Photoshop CS5
Cheap ACDSee Pro for Mac
Buy Nuance OmniPage 17 Professional
Buy Rosetta Stone English
Buy Adobe After Effects CS5.5 OEM
Cheap Ableton Suite 8 for Mac
cialis lowest price
price viagra
generic viagra in canada
generic cialis canadian
cheapest online cialis
online pharmacy cost levitra
Nuclear Industry Association Logo
Thursday 9 February 2012
Home
About Us
Contact Us
News
Key Issues
Industry Information
Useful Links
Events
Industry Link
UK Nuclear Future Brochure
NIA Industry Maps
essentialguide.png
edf_button_copy.png
get_involved
energy_excellence
nucleargraduates

 

Home
Editorial | Print |  E-mail
Monday, 24 July 2006
I wonder if the Regulators gathering recently in Rome appreciated the irony of meeting in a country which has suffered two large scale blackouts or let themselves, for just a moment, consider the possibility that with New Zealand, California, the US and Canadian east coast, Denmark and for a short time London, this might just be part of a trend.

Tony Cooper, NIA Chairman
I wonder if the Regulators gathering recently in Rome appreciated the irony of meeting in a country which has suffered two large scale blackouts or let themselves, for just a moment, consider the possibility that with New Zealand, California, the US and Canadian east coast, Denmark and for a short time London, this might just be part of a trend.

In terms of specific cause and effect there is no clear trend but there might perhaps be some common themes. The impact of rising demand on infrastructure which has had inadequate investment and which is everywhere swamping the switch to more sustainable energy sources, or a reliance on cross border supply. These have not been UK issues so far. They are about to become so.

Consider the following generalised question. What is the price premium required to maintain reasonable supply security if the supplier is subject to pressure simultaneously in their domestic and export markets? Consider the same question put more specifically.

What is the premium which will be necessary to ensure secure gas supplies for a market at the end of a long set of pipelines, over and above the inevitable extra system operating costs? Or the apparently different but essentially similar question of what premium a market must pay to maintain security if it is over reliant on scattered, intrinsically unpredictable intermittent sources?

Both these scenarios will shortly apply to the UK and in both cases there is a reliance on the view that, on the whole, geographically distinct sources of demand and supply will not be under simultaneous pressure. But on the whole is not always. We do get periods of UK wide still weather. We have just experienced a Europe wide heat wave, which seriously stretched the electricity exporter of last resort, Edf.

We need also to remember that a commercially acceptable risk may not be socially or politically acceptable. The public never swallowed Yorkshire Water's 100 year drought excuse and Government couldn't avoid some of the blame. There are grave risks therefore in putting particular pressure on the most secure and sustainable energy source we have.

 
< Prev   Next >
Nuclear - part of the solution